<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Being Boring &#187; finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wp.najja.org/archives/tag/finance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wp.najja.org</link>
	<description>I'll find my soul as I go home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:37:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>关于财经杂志的怨念</title>
		<link>http://wp.najja.org/archives/8</link>
		<comments>http://wp.najja.org/archives/8#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>najja</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.najja.org/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[自打看了豆瓣上某狂人鄙视国内财经媒体（已删贴，我在reader里存档）后，俺一时头脑发热订了一大砣金融新闻rss,主要是marketwatch.com，wsj的print edition，nytimes的dealbook和零碎几个PE,IB的blog。marketwatch虽然好，但是量超级大，每天怕有100篇。wsj和nytimes也有几十篇。最不能接受的是这些都不是全文输出。我rss主要用手机看，看个文还得跳回原网站太痛苦了。他们为啥不能像金融时报中文版那样全文输出哇？插广告也行啊。小气鬼！
另外表扬wsj写手的blog叫deal journal的，有深度有广度，还是全文输出rss。wsj真是神奇的杂志，market版很赞扬美国市场多么的efficient，company版又致力于exploit market inefficiency。
另外臭骂the economist。不仅是摘要feed，而且是用的服务是feedburner，最发指的是它的移动版网站是要钱的(wsj nyt都不是)。
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>自打看了豆瓣上某狂人鄙视国内财经媒体（已删贴，我在reader里<a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/user/08232511459145043693/state/com.google/starred">存档</a>）后，俺一时头脑发热订了一大砣金融新闻rss,主要是<a href="http://marketwatch.com/" target="_blank">marketw<wbr>atch.com</a>，<a href="http://online.wsj.com/home">wsj</a>的print edition，nytimes的<a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/">dealbook</a>和零碎几个<a href="http://www.pehub.com/">PE</a>,<a href="http://www.mergersandinquisitions.com/">IB</a>的blog。marketwatch虽然好，但是量超级大，每天怕有100篇。wsj和nytimes也有几十篇。最不能接受的是这些都不是全文输出。我rss主要用手机看，看个文还得跳回原网站太痛苦了。他们为啥不能像金融时报中文版那样全文输出哇？插广告也行啊。小气鬼！
<div id="1ezb" class="ArwC7c ckChnd">另外表扬wsj写手的blog叫<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/">deal journal</a>的，有深度有广度，还是全文输出rss。<wbr>wsj真是神奇的杂志，<wbr>market版很赞扬美国市场多么的efficient，<wbr>company版又致力于exploit market inefficiency。</p>
<p>另外臭骂<a href="http://economist.com/">the economist</a>。不仅是摘要feed，<wbr>而且是用的服务是feedburner，<wbr>最发指的是它的<a href="http://www.economist.com/mobile/">移动版</a>网站是要钱的(wsj nyt都不是)。</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wp.najja.org/archives/8/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>thoughts on finance</title>
		<link>http://wp.najja.org/archives/211</link>
		<comments>http://wp.najja.org/archives/211#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>najja</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cfa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.najja.org/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe I find studying finance confusing because I am used to the air-tight field of engineering and science. Finance doesn't have a theory of its own. Stochastic calculus might be the closest but it is sometimes as good as guessing. Because the wild human psychology accounts for a major part in finance, it is very, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I find studying finance confusing because I am used to the air-tight field of engineering and science. Finance doesn't have a theory of its own. Stochastic calculus might be the closest but it is sometimes as good as guessing. Because the wild human psychology accounts for a major part in finance, it is very, very unpredictable. Besides, you cannot set a controlled experiment in finance because history occurs only once. The signal-to-noise in this field is as low as possible. See the current scene on chinese stock market ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wp.najja.org/archives/211/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

